St. Louis, Mo: Former Company Accounting Clerk Stephanie Baker Pleads Guilty

St. Louis, Mo: Former Company Accounting Clerk Stephanie Baker Pleads Guilty for Defrauding the Company

(STL.News) – Stephanie Baker, 48, of O’Fallon, Missouri, pleaded guilty to three counts of mail fraud related to her former position in the accounting department of Prairie Farms Dairy Supply Company.  Baker appeared, today, before United States District Henry Autrey who accepted her pleas and set sentencing for January 12, 2021.

According to the indictment and plea agreement, Baker was an employee of Prairie Farms, working in that company’s accounting department.  Baker’s duties and responsibilities included applying and allocating Prairie Farms customer payments to their customer accounts.  As part of her duties, Baker would routinely receive checks from Prairie Farms customers, and make accounting entries to apply those checks to each customer’s account and therefore reduce the balance owed to Prairie Farms of that particular customer account by the amount of the check received.

C.S. owned and operated a Dairy Queen restaurant franchise in southern Illinois.  DQ Columbia maintained an account at Prairie Farms and purchased and received products from Prairie Farms on a regular basis.  DQ Columbia was required under its franchise agreement to order and receive substantially all of its food, dairy products, and supplies from Prairie Farms.

Beginning in or about March, 2018 and continuing through in or about December, 2018, Baker devised, intended to devise, and knowingly participated in a scheme to defraud and obtain money from Prairie Farms and C.S., in an approximate amount of $192,336.74, by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises.

Baker received and applied payments from Prairie Farms customers other than DQ Columbia to DQ Columbia’s account.  DQ Columbia, therefore, received credit and a reduction it its account balance for payments that were not made by DQ Columbia, but instead were made by other Prairie Farms customers.  Further, the other Prairie Farms customers who made the actual payments did not receive credit and a reduction in their own account balances.  As part of her scheme, Baker misapplied approximately $143,933.74 in other customer payments to the DQ Columbia account.  Baker withheld and did not mail out statements to the other Prairie Farms customers so that those other customers would not realize that their prior payments to Prairie Farms had not been credited to their accounts.

Baker falsely represented to C.S. that, in order for DQ Columbia to continue receiving food, dairy products and supplies from Prairie Farms, C.S. needed to make cash payments personally to Baker.  At Baker’s direction, C.S. met with Baker on numerous occasions and delivered cash to Baker based upon Baker’s false representations that she would deliver the cash to Prairie Farms and credit DQ Columbia’s account accordingly.  In fact, Baker kept the cash she received from C.S., did not credit DQ Columbia’s account for the cash payments, and used the cash for her own personal use, including for the boarding and related expenses for a show horse and other general living expenses, unrelated to the legitimate business of Prairie Farms.  C.S. met with Baker on numerous occasions and made cash payments to Baker totaling approximately $48,403.00.  Prairie Farms and its owners had no knowledge of the cash payments which C.S. made to Baker, and received no portion of these cash payments.

Baker received numerous checks from Prairie Farms customers through the U.S. mail and as part of her scheme misapplied those payments as credits to the account of DQ Columbia.

Baker faces a potential statutory maximum sentence as to each count of mail fraud of twenty years’ imprisonment, and a fine of $250,000.  The Court is required to consider the United States Sentencing Commission guidelines in sentencing defendant.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation investigated this case.  Assistant U.S. Attorney Hal Goldsmith is handling the case for the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

CLICK to VIEW SOURCE

%d bloggers like this: